Article: How Big is OTC Really?

22 March 2013 | Jon Skinner

What do the hundreds of trillions mean and how can we compare this with other markets?

Scarcely a day goes by without a press article or speech mentioning in its introduction the “more $600+ trillion OTC derivatives market”.    Whilst this may liven up the subject, this unnecessarily inflames concern.  Here’s why.

What are the figures?  

The quoted figures come from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) half yearly reporting on OTC derivatives market activity – published on their website.  The latest is: BIS OTC 2012 H1 which notes $639 trillion open notional.

Why inflammatory?  

Because $639 trillion is way bigger than the global aggregate of almost anything (GDP, government debt, global securities issued, … etc. etc.) and is not a measure or an approximation of the value of all OTC trades outstanding.

Why not?  

Unlike bonds where the notional value and market value are close together (one being within a few % of the other), an on-market interest rate swap has near zero market value on trade date whereas notional could easily be $100m or more.   Only through interest rate movements through the swap’s life does it acquire significant value (which can be both positive or negative).  Even then the value will likely remain a very small fraction of the notional value.

How has ISDA tried to help?  

ISDA produces companion half yearly figures which eliminate double counting of CCP trades (makes sense) and also all of FX derivatives (not sure I understand the rationale).  The latest is: ISDA OTC 2012 H1 which notes $417 trillion adjusted open notional.   This also emphasizes the point that after netting and collateral the real aggregate exposure is a tiny fraction of the notional.   Whilst helpful, $417 trillion is in practice just as inflammatory as $639 trillion and it is worth further emphasizing the market value and credit exposure numbers produced.

Are market value and credit exposure available?   

Yes.   BIS also collects gross market value as part of the survey which collects notional values.  ISDA combines this with netting and collateralization effectiveness percentages it collects to estimate further credit exposures:

  • $25.4 trillion gross market value[1] – a decent measure of the current value of all gross swap assets held by banks and directly comparable with other financial instruments (see below).  This also implicitly eliminates double counting at CCPs because an in the money trade for one bank will be out of the money for the other.
  • $3.7 trillion gross credit exposure (after netting before collateralization) and $1.1 trillion net credit exposure (after netting and collateralization).  This last figure measures the total counterparty “current” exposure in the market.  Whilst valid, a degree of statistical error can be expected given this is derived by multiplying together numbers from two different surveys.
[1] Gross market value is the sum of in the money trade values across all reporting banks – before netting out of the money trades and before collateral
Is that all the risk? 
No.  All the above are measures of current exposure only.  Potential future exposure beyond this is significant given OTC products are often relatively long duration (maybe averaging 7 years or more).  
Note 1: market values in other instruments do not measure potential future exposure either.  
Note 2: initial margin, default fund contributions and CCP / bank capital are all buffers against against potential future exposure.

So how does OTC compare with other markets?  

Comparing global market values at the same point in time i.e. end 2010, we have:

Instrument Global Market Value ($trn)
Bonds 94
Loans 70
Equities 54
OTC Derivatives 21

Sources: OTC figures from BIS OTC 2010 H2, Other figures from McKinsey end 2010 global financial stock. Whilst not in any way concluding that OTC is a small market, I hope that this context will contribute in some small way to a measured and productive conclusion to the discussions around re-regulation of the swaps market.



value or risk outstanding than that of Bonds, Equities and Loans, you can see his analysis here:http://theotcspace.com/2013/03/22/how-big-is-otc-really/. Jon makes the point that this comparingcurrent exposure and not any potential future exposure,

Reblogged this on Carl A R Weir's Blog.

posting at the OTC space, does a nice job of setting out the size of various markets. In particular he uses gross market

How Big is OTC Really? What do the hundreds of trillions mean and how can we compare this with other markets? http://theotcspace.com/2013/03/22/how-big-is-otc-really/

Jon Skinner, The OTC Space, How Big is the OTC Really, here.

the other side of the story on this site here(How Big is OTC

proper way to think about this can be found at How Big is OTCReally? by Jon Skinner on the OTCSpace website. Our thanks to Bill Hodgson from www.OTCSpace.com for

was your favourite? One of mine was: How Big is the OTC Market Really? and the development of EMIR 2, due in the medium term and sure to keep us all